|
|||||||
| Performance Engine, Transmission, Naturally Aspirated, Forced Induction, etc. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
||||
|
NO axleback .. go catback .. u'll get more from that ...
the axlebac design is bent and curvy that causes restriction and loss of power the catbac design is more straight with less bends to free up more for better exhaust flow which ever u decide .. here are ur links Cat Backs scion tc cat back - Google Product Search Axle Back scion tc axle back - Google Product Search |
|
||||
|
some of them are definitely straghter than others, but i dont think its a difference of axleback and catback. i think the hks axleback is nearly straight compared to my injen. had i known this was an issue, i may have gone with that one
__________________
New goal... |
|
||||
|
I'm not sayin anyone is wrong, but my Magnaflow cat-back bends a lot, and it puts out more hp than some other cat-backs.
__________________
Next Mods: 9.5psi pulley(waiting to install), Forge 007 BPV, Boost, Wideband, and oil Pres. gauges, Stage 2 Cams, AEM F/IC and tune 300whp here I come |
|
||||
|
yea! Lol
but what about exhausts for turbos? aka turbo or s-pipe back exhausts? b00gi3 you runnin one of these? i've only seen one for our car from Ptuning.com - Search Result mad expensive for the turbo back! but they claim big gains on boost apps.
__________________
New goal... |
|
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
nah i think s/c vs. turbo is diiferent when it comes to exhausts. something about the s/c needing to use the backpressure to increase the power. whereas, the turbo needs to release the extra pressure - hence 3 inch piping from header to tip.
i could have that backwards. but i think that's what i read on their site.
__________________
New goal... |